Letter from William Henry Seward to Frances Miller Seward, January 17, 1831
xml:
Letter from William Henry Seward to Frances Miller Seward, January 17, 1831
transcriber
Transcriber:spp:mep
student editorTranscriber:spp:sss
Distributor:Seward Family Digital Archive
Institution:University of Rochester
Repository:Rare Books and Special Collections
Date:1831-01-17
In the context of this project, private URIs with the prefix "psn" point to
person elements in the project's persons.xml authority file.
In the context of this project, private URIs with the prefix "pla" point to
place elements in the project's places.xml authority file.
In the context of this project, private URIs with the prefix "psn" point to
person elements in the project's staff.xml authority file.
In the context of this project, private URIs with the prefix "psn" point to
person elements in the project's bibl.xml authority file.
verical-align: super; font-size: 12px;
text-decoration: underline;
text-decoration: line-through;
color: red;
Letter from William Henry Seward to Frances Miller Seward, January 17, 1831
action: sent
sender: William Seward
Birth: 1801-05-16
Death: 1872-10-10
location: Albany, NY
receiver: Frances Seward
Birth: 1805-09-24
Death: 1865-06-21
location: Auburn, NY
transcription: mep
revision: ekk 2015-09-09
<>
Page
1
Albany, Jan’y 17th Monday.
I ought not to forget to inform you
about our debate in the Senate today.
I called for the consideration of my resolution.
The Regency men betrayed warmth & agitation[ . ]
Reason:
Every device was resorted to defeat it without
encountering danger in public estimation.
G.
for and promised to be a good pupil. Something
of the debate is in Weeds
Page
2
I said but little, very conscious of a con-
siderable trembling of the knees.
“The Party” voted us down by the united
vote of Regency against Anti masonry. I
feel much releived by having surmounted
the difficulty of making a debut. I can
henceforth speak without fear, if occasion
requires me to say anything.
Albany, Jan’y 17th Monday.
I ought not to forget to inform you
about our debate in the Senate today.
I called for the consideration of my resolution.
The Regency men betrayed warmth & agitation[ . ]
Supplied
Every device was resorted to defeat it without
encountering danger in public estimation.
G.
Birth: 1793-04-12 Death: 1854-02-23Certainty: Probable
read me a lecture which I ^returned my^ thanksed him for and promised to be a good pupil. Something
of the debate is in Weeds
Birth: 1797-11-15 Death: 1882-11-22
paper this afternoon.I said but little, very conscious of a con-
siderable trembling of the knees.
“The Party” voted us down by the united
vote of Regency against Anti masonry. I
feel much releived by having surmounted
the difficulty of making a debut. I can
henceforth speak without fear, if occasion
requires me to say anything.